Thursday, 6 September 2018
Sunday, 22 February 2015
Moon Landing - Why it simply did not happen
This could go on forever so ill get right to it
1 The Van Allen Radiation belt
If evidence of us being a complete pain in the arse was ever needed then simply look at van allen.It surrounds the earth...just the earth with LETHAL radiation ,almost like a "prison"
The furthest man has been is 120 miles in the shuttle/space station
Some pics from NASA`a archives that were lost for many years,the steering wheel & pedals are just too funny
MORE TO COME ...MAYBE AFTER TEA :P
OK so the landing - armstrong is sat on a variable throttle hypergolic rocket & hes talking like hes at a dinner table ,it would drown him out & the radio was not even audible when he crashed the prototype on earth ...too much static .ON EARTH !! he bailed at about 150 feet & parachuted to safety in time .
NASA dont even bother trying to hide pics anymore they are politicians of revenue ,like a politician they simply deflect questions n raise other issues.
WHY DID`NT THEY TAKE A TELESCOPE TO THE MOON ?
Because that would mean fabricating whole galaxies that would eventually lead to the truth .It was our best chance to see the heavens EVER.After spacesuits & life support the 1st thing onboard would be a telescope.
WHY DO THIS ?
1 They did try bless em they tried but the cost was gargantuan,to spend all this money with no results is bad for business.So you cannot make it to the moon...you fake it to the moon.
The simulations they realised looked so convincing that they could get ALL THE BUDGET for 1% of the work & bribe people with the rest ( which is probably a black ops on going account).
1 The Van Allen Radiation belt
If evidence of us being a complete pain in the arse was ever needed then simply look at van allen.It surrounds the earth...just the earth with LETHAL radiation ,almost like a "prison"
The furthest man has been is 120 miles in the shuttle/space station
only probes have been as far as the inner & outer belts & beyond.
They had tinfoil in the space suits to protect so ask this.......
why do you need a lead shield for an xray here? yet they needed simply - tinfoil1?
2 The Moon
The moon is zero gravity ,armstrongs boot made a 1 centimetre perfect impression on the moons surface,yet the 4 ton lander made ZERO impression,not 1 spec of dust was on the landers feet,yet armstrong states " i can kick up the dust with my toe" .No crater from the thrust of the engine POINTING DOWN JUST FEET FROM THE MOONS SURFACE.It has the consistancy of dry cement ,ergo very powdery( THIS ALSO SCREAMS WATER!! otherwise it would be like sand & NOT leave that perfect boot print - try it).Therefore impressions would be made by any object,the lunar rover left tyre tracks.yet the LEM left not 1 iota of disturbance.
The film,is very suspicious,the stills are pristeen whereas the ONE piece of film that is awful,grainy & out of focus is ironically the ONLY ONE WE WANT TO SEE! Armstrong & Aldrin on the moon!
The in craft camera footage is perfect - in colour - yet they chose (NASA) to take this awful black & white camera....its an astounding mistake.
Furthermore,no stills are taken of the "One small step" only - ONLY the TV pics ?!?! anyone see an issue here.
REMEMBER WE ARE TALKING ABOUT THE USA,THEY HAD MORE CAMERAS LOOKING AT TWO SKY SCRAPERS ON 9/11 THAN WERE ON THE PENTAGON!...Think about that ......
THE HATCH ON THE LEM WAS TOO SMALL (SEE PICS BELOW) it was also on the right & opened INWARDS ( as in case of pressure leak its better to have in blow in so it can be pushed back) the day that the landing was announced NASA "destroyed" 600.000 pages of data relating to the 28 LEM modules that were proposed & a further 88,000 on the one in use...IT BEGGARS BELIEF- why was this done ?
Because the hatch on the lem was too small,astronaut & back pack ( at that angle) could not fit & get out.
THE JUMP....
This is the most unbelievable part for me
ARMSTRONG IS SO CONFIDENT HE ACTUALLY JUMPS FROM THE (TOO SHORT) LADDER ON TO THE MOONS SURFACE !! one rip in that suit & he is toast...on a later mission the astronaut takes an unreal 4 RUNGS out & jumps!! NO WAY WOULD YOU TAKE A RISK LIKE THIS IN THAT ENVIRONMENT,it literally beggars belief
HUBBLE.........
NASA lie by saying hubble is not suitable for looking at the moon,its the PERFECT tool & was even TESTED BY FOCUSING ITS FIRST (FAULTY) MIRROR ON THE ONLY VISIBLE OBJECT - OUR MOON! Hubble can see easily the LEM stand that resides after every mission,the lunar rovers (cars) are there,experiments are still there.As typical humans we have littered the moon in just 6 "visits" Hubbles so called amazing pictures are open to interpretation,what you are seeing are NOT real time pictures they are computer generated from light photons taken from hubble (basically trillions of pixels that are then coloured by computer).
THE TECH
Apollo had a joke of a computer (often quoted as 8 megabyte in apollo 13 dramas/movies)
The so-called Apollo Guidance Computer (AGC) used a real time operating system, which enabled astronauts to enter simple commands by typing in pairs of nouns and verbs, to control the spacecraft. It was more basic than the electronics in modern toasters that have computer controlled stop/start/defrost buttons. It had approximately 64Kbyte of memory and operated at 0.043MHz.
PIC OF THE LUNAR LANDER DOOR & NOW ENLARGED (FOR THE PRESS) DOOR
MORE TO COME ...MAYBE AFTER TEA :P
OK so the landing - armstrong is sat on a variable throttle hypergolic rocket & hes talking like hes at a dinner table ,it would drown him out & the radio was not even audible when he crashed the prototype on earth ...too much static .ON EARTH !! he bailed at about 150 feet & parachuted to safety in time .
NASA dont even bother trying to hide pics anymore they are politicians of revenue ,like a politician they simply deflect questions n raise other issues.
WHY DID`NT THEY TAKE A TELESCOPE TO THE MOON ?
Because that would mean fabricating whole galaxies that would eventually lead to the truth .It was our best chance to see the heavens EVER.After spacesuits & life support the 1st thing onboard would be a telescope.
WHY DO THIS ?
1 They did try bless em they tried but the cost was gargantuan,to spend all this money with no results is bad for business.So you cannot make it to the moon...you fake it to the moon.
The simulations they realised looked so convincing that they could get ALL THE BUDGET for 1% of the work & bribe people with the rest ( which is probably a black ops on going account).
Tuesday, 15 July 2014
Understanding how Kennedy died Ballistic facts.
The daddy of conspiracies.
Over 5000 books,probably more TV & DVD`s than that.
Yet this is all conjecture-what matters are FACTS!
The key to understand WHAT happened lies in a simple fact.
Two Types of Bullet Were Fired
As far as can be deduced from the poor state of the medical evidence, the damage to President Kennedy’s head appears to have been caused by a soft–nosed bullet, a type designed to break into fragments on impact. The wounds to Kennedy’s and Governor Connally’s torsos, however, were caused by metal–jacketed bullets, a type designed to remain intact on impact. The bullet and bullet shells that were discovered on the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository were of the latter type.
President Kennedy’s head wound cannot, therefore, have been caused by the rifle that was also discovered on the sixth floor. The nature of the head wound implies that more than one gunman took part in the "incident".
ASSAULT RIFLE ROUNDS (Secret service issue)
SO WHAT HAPPENED
The ONLY logical conclusion is that 2 WEAPONS were used -one simply lines up the trajectory of the head shot (kennedy leaning forward jackie realising there is a problem AFTER OSWALD HITS JFK in the throat ) The shot -THE KILL SHOT can ONLY have come from??
THE SECRET SERVICE CAR BEHIND -now,i am NOT saying they did this on purpose in fact i am going to leave this as a MASSIVE anti climax.......
IT WAS AN ACCIDENT -a simple tragic million to one accident.(This REALLY annoys the conspiracy theorists-as it does not sell books & dvds !)
JFK was shot by Secret service agent GEORGE HICKEY -who was in the "chase car" (secret service car armed to the teeth with assault weapons)
Oswald fires.misses,hits James Tague on the underpass (bridge in front of motorcade) Cars slow down,SS agents grab their weapons (as trained to)-speed up-Oswald fires 2nd shot -hits Kennedy in the Throat-,Both cars judder again The Secret service car still reacting to the 1st shot now have weapons in hand -safety OFF- 2nd shot causes SS car to judder- HICKEY lets off a round , by accident ( Colt AR15) as he falls forward-hits kennedy in the head .....
What do you do?
Admit to the world that it was an accident ? Or use the fact Oswald who WAS there there is no doubt he was up to no good (though he was an awful shot!) as a cover story ? I have always thought he was there to scare the president.As shot 1 was so far off,for a soldier,it was embarrassing he could be hundreds of feet wide.Maybe he got "unlucky" on shot 2 & actually hit the president instead of the car....Maybe ...Either way 2 guns were used .
Better a lone nut than a secret service who shoot the worlds most powerful leader by accident.
What happened to Hickey ?...He never spoke to anyone about that day EVER ,he was a solitary man,gave no interviews & died in relative obscurity.He took a publishing company to court for the info above.He was a decorated WW2 vet & fought in Korea & was a public servant-many books websites & TV shows forget he was a hero & keeping quiet-for the good of the nation -he did his job till the bitter end...He was A GOOD AGENT ...
Over 5000 books,probably more TV & DVD`s than that.
Yet this is all conjecture-what matters are FACTS!
The key to understand WHAT happened lies in a simple fact.
This is the only decent still of the weapon that actually killed JFK.
Two Types of Bullet Were Fired
As far as can be deduced from the poor state of the medical evidence, the damage to President Kennedy’s head appears to have been caused by a soft–nosed bullet, a type designed to break into fragments on impact. The wounds to Kennedy’s and Governor Connally’s torsos, however, were caused by metal–jacketed bullets, a type designed to remain intact on impact. The bullet and bullet shells that were discovered on the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository were of the latter type.
President Kennedy’s head wound cannot, therefore, have been caused by the rifle that was also discovered on the sixth floor. The nature of the head wound implies that more than one gunman took part in the "incident".
ASSAULT RIFLE ROUNDS (Secret service issue)
FULL METAL JACKET ROUNDS (Oswald rifle)
FMJ are often mistaken as powerful (any idiot on call of duty who equips them soon gets downed by the more powerful assault rounds) The name is simply romanticised by the film Full metal Jacket .It sounds Tough.
They are designed -to send the soldier home to his family BY PASSING THROUGH THE BODY-CLEAN <<<remember that !
ASSAULT ROUNDS - are a weapon of WAR they are deadly killing ammunition
Entry wounds are small often in millimetres- but when the bullet impacts it shatters creating a massive exit wound (just look at the back of JFK`s head -NO WAY was this caused by oswalds FMJ round -REMEMBER OSWALD WAS BEHIND KENNEDY !)
The fact JFK has 3.5 AND 5.6 mm entry wounds is odd.The fact that the exit wound on the throat (neck tie) is the same as the entry is normal -the MASSIVE GAPING quadrant of kennedys head that was blown clean away however (for an FMJ) is totally ludicrous!
SO WHAT HAPPENED
The ONLY logical conclusion is that 2 WEAPONS were used -one simply lines up the trajectory of the head shot (kennedy leaning forward jackie realising there is a problem AFTER OSWALD HITS JFK in the throat ) The shot -THE KILL SHOT can ONLY have come from??
THE SECRET SERVICE CAR BEHIND -now,i am NOT saying they did this on purpose in fact i am going to leave this as a MASSIVE anti climax.......
IT WAS AN ACCIDENT -a simple tragic million to one accident.(This REALLY annoys the conspiracy theorists-as it does not sell books & dvds !)
JFK was shot by Secret service agent GEORGE HICKEY -who was in the "chase car" (secret service car armed to the teeth with assault weapons)
Oswald fires.misses,hits James Tague on the underpass (bridge in front of motorcade) Cars slow down,SS agents grab their weapons (as trained to)-speed up-Oswald fires 2nd shot -hits Kennedy in the Throat-,Both cars judder again The Secret service car still reacting to the 1st shot now have weapons in hand -safety OFF- 2nd shot causes SS car to judder- HICKEY lets off a round , by accident ( Colt AR15) as he falls forward-hits kennedy in the head .....
What do you do?
Admit to the world that it was an accident ? Or use the fact Oswald who WAS there there is no doubt he was up to no good (though he was an awful shot!) as a cover story ? I have always thought he was there to scare the president.As shot 1 was so far off,for a soldier,it was embarrassing he could be hundreds of feet wide.Maybe he got "unlucky" on shot 2 & actually hit the president instead of the car....Maybe ...Either way 2 guns were used .
Better a lone nut than a secret service who shoot the worlds most powerful leader by accident.
What happened to Hickey ?...He never spoke to anyone about that day EVER ,he was a solitary man,gave no interviews & died in relative obscurity.He took a publishing company to court for the info above.He was a decorated WW2 vet & fought in Korea & was a public servant-many books websites & TV shows forget he was a hero & keeping quiet-for the good of the nation -he did his job till the bitter end...He was A GOOD AGENT ...
Things mistaken for UFO`s Number 2 - Lenticular clouds
These are often mistaken & pretty awesome to behold.
They often form over mountains or peaks & seem to hug them,Where stable moist air flows over a mountain or a range of mountains, a series of large-scale standing waves may form on the downwind side. If the temperature at the crest of the wave drops to the dew point, moisture in the air may condense to form lenticular clouds. As the moist air moves back down into the trough of the wave, the cloud may evaporate back into vapor.
Some seem to stack up forming some great shapes.
They often form over mountains or peaks & seem to hug them,Where stable moist air flows over a mountain or a range of mountains, a series of large-scale standing waves may form on the downwind side. If the temperature at the crest of the wave drops to the dew point, moisture in the air may condense to form lenticular clouds. As the moist air moves back down into the trough of the wave, the cloud may evaporate back into vapor.
Some seem to stack up forming some great shapes.
The last example, above, shows how easily these are taken as " Flying saucers"
Monday, 14 July 2014
Things mistaken for UFO`s Number 1- The Sea Shadow
Probably reported more than anything else was the highly classified Stealth Sea Shadow
Basically a stealth plane-But a boat.Radical avionics allowed this to virtually be unknown except to " the UFO nutters" who persistantly insisted this was a reality...WE WERE RIGHT!
Some speculate it is actually a submarine,while others claim its both a Sub orbital aircraft AND a submarine !
Inside this mammoth barge it was shipped in secrecy from 1976 until the 90s rarely seen by other shipping !
Basically a stealth plane-But a boat.Radical avionics allowed this to virtually be unknown except to " the UFO nutters" who persistantly insisted this was a reality...WE WERE RIGHT!
Some speculate it is actually a submarine,while others claim its both a Sub orbital aircraft AND a submarine !Inside this mammoth barge it was shipped in secrecy from 1976 until the 90s rarely seen by other shipping !
The 100the sea shadow rolls off the production line
looks pretty awesome on the water
Radical engine technology even for 1976 !
Thing is-when they admit they have something,they usually have the next generation IN SERVICE so watch the skies .......... & the sea .
400 thousand people worked on the atomic bomb yet less than 9 people knew the truth-COMPARTMENTALISATION is & was the key.As it was with stealth.Even Harry truman was unaware & HE WAS THE VICE PRESIDENT of a country about to drop this on Japan!NASA scientist in interview unwittingly shows POI on the Moon
A recent interview with Goddard (NASA) (they do these often online or via skype with kids,as part of lessons or for multimedia,when several journos at once will interview).
As the man gave his boring interview he uncovered what he was working on BEFORE the interview,a POI (point of interest) on the Moon - which we have zero interest in as we have been there...right?
As the man gave his boring interview he uncovered what he was working on BEFORE the interview,a POI (point of interest) on the Moon - which we have zero interest in as we have been there...right?
yet the same object on NASA`s official moon map - is NOT THERE.NASA Now dispute this saying everything from bad pictures to fogged camera lens.Why would an analyst be studying bad pics? thats the photography departments job! Or maybe it was done on purpose.,who knows....
The object is square or triangular depends on perspective.An odd shape for a dust laden surface (that made no impression with a LEM of many tons but armstrongs boot made a clear 2 cm seamless footprint?!?!).Odd,if not ground breaking.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)