1 The Van Allen Radiation belt
If evidence of us being a complete pain in the arse was ever needed then simply look at van allen.It surrounds the earth...just the earth with LETHAL radiation ,almost like a "prison"
The furthest man has been is 120 miles in the shuttle/space station
only probes have been as far as the inner & outer belts & beyond.
They had tinfoil in the space suits to protect so ask this.......
why do you need a lead shield for an xray here? yet they needed simply - tinfoil1?
2 The Moon
The moon is zero gravity ,armstrongs boot made a 1 centimetre perfect impression on the moons surface,yet the 4 ton lander made ZERO impression,not 1 spec of dust was on the landers feet,yet armstrong states " i can kick up the dust with my toe" .No crater from the thrust of the engine POINTING DOWN JUST FEET FROM THE MOONS SURFACE.It has the consistancy of dry cement ,ergo very powdery( THIS ALSO SCREAMS WATER!! otherwise it would be like sand & NOT leave that perfect boot print - try it).Therefore impressions would be made by any object,the lunar rover left tyre tracks.yet the LEM left not 1 iota of disturbance.
The film,is very suspicious,the stills are pristeen whereas the ONE piece of film that is awful,grainy & out of focus is ironically the ONLY ONE WE WANT TO SEE! Armstrong & Aldrin on the moon!
The in craft camera footage is perfect - in colour - yet they chose (NASA) to take this awful black & white camera....its an astounding mistake.
Furthermore,no stills are taken of the "One small step" only - ONLY the TV pics ?!?! anyone see an issue here.
REMEMBER WE ARE TALKING ABOUT THE USA,THEY HAD MORE CAMERAS LOOKING AT TWO SKY SCRAPERS ON 9/11 THAN WERE ON THE PENTAGON!...Think about that ......
THE HATCH ON THE LEM WAS TOO SMALL (SEE PICS BELOW) it was also on the right & opened INWARDS ( as in case of pressure leak its better to have in blow in so it can be pushed back) the day that the landing was announced NASA "destroyed" 600.000 pages of data relating to the 28 LEM modules that were proposed & a further 88,000 on the one in use...IT BEGGARS BELIEF- why was this done ?
Because the hatch on the lem was too small,astronaut & back pack ( at that angle) could not fit & get out.
THE JUMP....
This is the most unbelievable part for me
ARMSTRONG IS SO CONFIDENT HE ACTUALLY JUMPS FROM THE (TOO SHORT) LADDER ON TO THE MOONS SURFACE !! one rip in that suit & he is toast...on a later mission the astronaut takes an unreal 4 RUNGS out & jumps!! NO WAY WOULD YOU TAKE A RISK LIKE THIS IN THAT ENVIRONMENT,it literally beggars belief
HUBBLE.........
NASA lie by saying hubble is not suitable for looking at the moon,its the PERFECT tool & was even TESTED BY FOCUSING ITS FIRST (FAULTY) MIRROR ON THE ONLY VISIBLE OBJECT - OUR MOON! Hubble can see easily the LEM stand that resides after every mission,the lunar rovers (cars) are there,experiments are still there.As typical humans we have littered the moon in just 6 "visits" Hubbles so called amazing pictures are open to interpretation,what you are seeing are NOT real time pictures they are computer generated from light photons taken from hubble (basically trillions of pixels that are then coloured by computer).
THE TECH
Apollo had a joke of a computer (often quoted as 8 megabyte in apollo 13 dramas/movies)
The so-called Apollo Guidance Computer (AGC) used a real time operating system, which enabled astronauts to enter simple commands by typing in pairs of nouns and verbs, to control the spacecraft. It was more basic than the electronics in modern toasters that have computer controlled stop/start/defrost buttons. It had approximately 64Kbyte of memory and operated at 0.043MHz.
PIC OF THE LUNAR LANDER DOOR & NOW ENLARGED (FOR THE PRESS) DOOR
MORE TO COME ...MAYBE AFTER TEA :P
OK so the landing - armstrong is sat on a variable throttle hypergolic rocket & hes talking like hes at a dinner table ,it would drown him out & the radio was not even audible when he crashed the prototype on earth ...too much static .ON EARTH !! he bailed at about 150 feet & parachuted to safety in time .
NASA dont even bother trying to hide pics anymore they are politicians of revenue ,like a politician they simply deflect questions n raise other issues.
WHY DID`NT THEY TAKE A TELESCOPE TO THE MOON ?
Because that would mean fabricating whole galaxies that would eventually lead to the truth .It was our best chance to see the heavens EVER.After spacesuits & life support the 1st thing onboard would be a telescope.
WHY DO THIS ?
1 They did try bless em they tried but the cost was gargantuan,to spend all this money with no results is bad for business.So you cannot make it to the moon...you fake it to the moon.
The simulations they realised looked so convincing that they could get ALL THE BUDGET for 1% of the work & bribe people with the rest ( which is probably a black ops on going account).
